<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Development and Integrity Management by Eli Lopian &#187; Reviews</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.elilopian.com/category/reviews/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.elilopian.com</link>
	<description>Creating better software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 Jan 2011 15:54:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The price of not trying</title>
		<link>http://www.elilopian.com/2009/05/18/the-price-of-not-trying/</link>
		<comments>http://www.elilopian.com/2009/05/18/the-price-of-not-trying/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 10:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eli Lopian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elilopian.com/2009/05/18/the-price-of-not-trying/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Twitter has been under a lot of fire when changing the replies policy, they still did the right thing.     They tried, if they wouldn’t try then they will be no way to progress and grow, if they become scared of user response, we will get a mediocre system.    [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.elilopian.com/2009/05/18/the-price-of-not-trying/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Typemock in the local press</title>
		<link>http://www.elilopian.com/2009/03/08/typemock-in-the-local-press/</link>
		<comments>http://www.elilopian.com/2009/03/08/typemock-in-the-local-press/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 20:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eli Lopian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elilopian.com/2009/03/08/typemock-in-the-local-press/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The local &#8220;The Marker&#8221; Magazine has published an article about startups in the current economical crisis.

There is a cool picture of some of the crew eating on the bar. We don&#8217;t normally eat there, but on a lower table that is out of the frame, but the bar makes the picture looks really cool. I [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.elilopian.com/2009/03/08/typemock-in-the-local-press/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unit Tests and Developers under Pressure</title>
		<link>http://www.elilopian.com/2008/12/04/unit-tests-and-developers-under-pressure/</link>
		<comments>http://www.elilopian.com/2008/12/04/unit-tests-and-developers-under-pressure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 22:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eli Lopian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[.NET Tests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Agile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TDD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elilopian.com/2008/12/04/unit-tests-and-developers-under-pressure/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In TechEd 2008 David Platt interviewed Roy about the future of&#160; TDD. You should really view the Tech-Talk as Dave is really funny, although he does miss the number of possible TLA&#8217;s (which he recursively defines as a TLA = Three Letter Acronym) by 300.
About 5 minutes into the session David asks a key question: [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.elilopian.com/2008/12/04/unit-tests-and-developers-under-pressure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://microsofttech.fr.edgesuite.net/TechEdOnline/Videos/445_low.wmv" length="31991170" type="video/x-ms-wmv" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Typemock and Design Issues</title>
		<link>http://www.elilopian.com/2008/02/07/typemock-and-design-issues/</link>
		<comments>http://www.elilopian.com/2008/02/07/typemock-and-design-issues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 23:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eli Lopian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elilopian.com/2008/02/07/typemock-and-design-issues/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The new field mock feature that enables developers to mock fields has raised the questions:

Who needs to mock fields, (only bad programmers)? 
Does Typemock advocate bad design?
Is Typemock&#160;too&#160;powerful?

Advocating Good Design
Well, lets get one thing straight. I do advocate good design, the design of the software is an important factor and one that I spend a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.elilopian.com/2008/02/07/typemock-and-design-issues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Debugging Mocked Methods</title>
		<link>http://www.elilopian.com/2007/12/26/debugging-mocked-methods/</link>
		<comments>http://www.elilopian.com/2007/12/26/debugging-mocked-methods/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 20:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eli Lopian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elilopian.com/2007/12/26/debugging-mocked-methods/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although strict XP practices, value tests more then debugging, there are many cases where you still have to debug the code base to find defects. Doing this with mocked objects can be very fishy.
Evaluating Mocked Properties
When evaluating methods and Properties in the Debugger, the Debugger Hi-Jacks the running application to run the code that evaluate [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.elilopian.com/2007/12/26/debugging-mocked-methods/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Ultimate Proof for TypeMock</title>
		<link>http://www.elilopian.com/2007/10/31/the-ultimate-proof-for-typemock/</link>
		<comments>http://www.elilopian.com/2007/10/31/the-ultimate-proof-for-typemock/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 22:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eli Lopian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elilopian.com/2007/10/31/the-ultimate-proof-for-typemock/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When developer using&#160;TypeMock find it an indispensable tool,&#160;it is a sign that we really help ease the task of building lasting software.
Karell says it better:
The best way to see if you need something is to stop using it (or be prevented from using it) for a while and see if you reach out for it [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.elilopian.com/2007/10/31/the-ultimate-proof-for-typemock/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interview on DotNetRocks</title>
		<link>http://www.elilopian.com/2007/09/19/interview-on-dotnetrocks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.elilopian.com/2007/09/19/interview-on-dotnetrocks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 11:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eli Lopian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elilopian.com/2007/09/19/interview-on-dotnetrocks/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Richard has invited me for a chat on DotNetRocks. The topic being Unit Testing and Dependency Injection. I still have to find a nice photo for the show. Stay tuned











]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.elilopian.com/2007/09/19/interview-on-dotnetrocks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MailFrame&#8217;s CodeSpell</title>
		<link>http://www.elilopian.com/2006/10/04/mailframes-codespell/</link>
		<comments>http://www.elilopian.com/2006/10/04/mailframes-codespell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 11:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eli Lopian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elilopian.com/2006/10/04/mailframes-codespell/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had quite an embarrassing moment when Scott Hanselman who is reviewing TypeMock.NET sent me his first impressions.
The e-mails where screen-shots of spelling typo&#8217;s in TypeMock&#8217;s API&#8217;s documentation. It turns out that there are quite a few spelling mistakes in the API&#8217;s documentation.  
Well, we added a task to fix all these, but as [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.elilopian.com/2006/10/04/mailframes-codespell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

