<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Development and Integrity Management by Eli Lopian &#187; Product</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.elilopian.com/category/product/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.elilopian.com</link>
	<description>Creating better software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 16:20:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Typemock Patents- you&#8217;re missing the point</title>
		<link>http://www.elilopian.com/2010/02/24/typemock-patents-youre-missing-the-point/</link>
		<comments>http://www.elilopian.com/2010/02/24/typemock-patents-youre-missing-the-point/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 11:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eli Lopian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Product]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elilopian.com/2010/02/24/typemock-patents-youre-missing-the-point/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Roy just asked me to blog about a twitter-conversation on our Typemock patents.&#160; It is true, we do have a patent. Its number is: PCT/IL2007/001152&#160; It is natural for companies to file patents of their innovations and inventions.
We have no answers to the questions that where asked and we haven’t any policy about this as [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.elilopian.com/2010/02/24/typemock-patents-youre-missing-the-point/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gaps I found while dog-fooding Typemock Isolator</title>
		<link>http://www.elilopian.com/2009/08/17/gaps-i-found-while-dog-fooding-typemock-isolator/</link>
		<comments>http://www.elilopian.com/2009/08/17/gaps-i-found-while-dog-fooding-typemock-isolator/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 18:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eli Lopian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unit Tests]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elilopian.com/2009/08/17/gaps-i-found-while-dog-fooding-typemock-isolator/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ I have been dog-fooding Typemock Isolator with the Metric Dashboard. There are quite a few gaps in the product that I have found while using it. 
Before I go into the details of the gaps, I must point out that all these features exists in the older API’s (that are still available), but they [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.elilopian.com/2009/08/17/gaps-i-found-while-dog-fooding-typemock-isolator/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bug Fix Time not a good metric</title>
		<link>http://www.elilopian.com/2009/08/04/bug-fix-time-not-a-good-metric/</link>
		<comments>http://www.elilopian.com/2009/08/04/bug-fix-time-not-a-good-metric/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 16:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eli Lopian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Code Integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elilopian.com/2009/08/04/bug-fix-time-not-a-good-metric/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After a few weeks using the BugFixTime metric, I found that metric too hard to understand and leaves the developer and managers clueless to what that have to do to fix the metric.
We have done some internal thinking and some feedback and have created the next generation of this tool built to help teams develop [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.elilopian.com/2009/08/04/bug-fix-time-not-a-good-metric/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Simple or Simply Terrible</title>
		<link>http://www.elilopian.com/2009/05/19/simple-or-simply-terrible/</link>
		<comments>http://www.elilopian.com/2009/05/19/simple-or-simply-terrible/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 11:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eli Lopian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Product]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elilopian.com/2009/05/19/simple-or-simply-terrible/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I read the Lead Blog post: Simplicity.
Simplicity means the achievement of maximum effect with minimal means. - Dr. Koichi Kawana
I though that was the definition of Effectiveness.
I think that a better definition is: Clarity, Precision, and Ease
Once you are clear, precise and easy, you will probably be effective. That is what makes simplicity so hard, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.elilopian.com/2009/05/19/simple-or-simply-terrible/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Managing the support</title>
		<link>http://www.elilopian.com/2009/04/27/managing-the-support/</link>
		<comments>http://www.elilopian.com/2009/04/27/managing-the-support/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 19:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eli Lopian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Management for Geeks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elilopian.com/2009/04/27/managing-the-support/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We take our support really seriously here at Typemock, our  customers see and talk about this great value. But there is much more to support then fixing bugs.
We learn from our support how our customers are using the application and what are the pit falls. From every case we proactively try to find out [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.elilopian.com/2009/04/27/managing-the-support/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why do we ignore your arguments?</title>
		<link>http://www.elilopian.com/2009/03/26/why-do-we-ignore-your-arguments/</link>
		<comments>http://www.elilopian.com/2009/03/26/why-do-we-ignore-your-arguments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 09:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eli Lopian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Release]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elilopian.com/2009/03/26/why-do-we-ignore-your-arguments/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the release of Isolator Version 5.3, we have added the ability to simulate  external components based on the arguments passed to those components. We called this Conditional Behavior. 
Our default is to ignore arguments, to fake a method without taking the arguments into consideration, neither the number of arguments (overloads) or the values [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.elilopian.com/2009/03/26/why-do-we-ignore-your-arguments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Isolator for SharePoint &#8211; Free License</title>
		<link>http://www.elilopian.com/2008/11/24/isolator-for-sharepoint-free-license/</link>
		<comments>http://www.elilopian.com/2008/11/24/isolator-for-sharepoint-free-license/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 15:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eli Lopian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[.NET Tests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Release]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SharePoint]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elilopian.com/2008/11/24/isolator-for-sharepoint-free-license/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Get a free Typemock Isolator license: 
[Update: Contest is finished, Thanks to all you bloggers]
We’re announcing today about a new product: Isolator for SharePoint. It is almost the same as Typemock Isolator, but will only work on APIs that are directly connected with sharepoint’s API. That means that if you only need to test sharepoint [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.elilopian.com/2008/11/24/isolator-for-sharepoint-free-license/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ruby Style Isolating &#8211; Aspect Faking</title>
		<link>http://www.elilopian.com/2008/11/06/ruby-style-isolating-aspect-faking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.elilopian.com/2008/11/06/ruby-style-isolating-aspect-faking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 10:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eli Lopian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[.NET Tests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TDD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elilopian.com/2008/11/06/ruby-style-isolating-aspect-faking/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have talked in the past about Ruby Style Isolating (Dynamically Typed), now it is part of the AAA syntax.&#160; 
The big value of this feature is that you don&#8217;t have to inherit a type in order to replace it with a fake, the downfall of this is that when you refactor your code, you [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.elilopian.com/2008/11/06/ruby-style-isolating-aspect-faking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Releasing Isolator 5.0 and Racer alpha</title>
		<link>http://www.elilopian.com/2008/08/15/releasing-isolator-50-and-racer-alpha/</link>
		<comments>http://www.elilopian.com/2008/08/15/releasing-isolator-50-and-racer-alpha/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 07:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eli Lopian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Release]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elilopian.com/2008/08/15/releasing-isolator-50-and-racer-alpha/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We have been working very hard this summer and we are just ready for 2 major releases.
Isolator 5.0
Based on customer feedback we are going to change our pricing model and add 3 new packages

Special Bundle, containing:

Typemock-Isolator
Annual Update Subscription
Ivonna for ASP.NET testing
TestDriven.NET for seamless Visual Studio testing

Personnel License, for single developers will cost only $199
Open Source [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.elilopian.com/2008/08/15/releasing-isolator-50-and-racer-alpha/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is the visibility of tested methods important?</title>
		<link>http://www.elilopian.com/2008/07/23/is-the-visibility-of-tested-methods-important/</link>
		<comments>http://www.elilopian.com/2008/07/23/is-the-visibility-of-tested-methods-important/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 18:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eli Lopian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Release]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elilopian.com/2008/07/23/is-the-visibility-of-tested-methods-important/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We are having quite a discussion lately about the importance of the visibility of tested methods.
See our internal Blog for the juicy stuff











]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.elilopian.com/2008/07/23/is-the-visibility-of-tested-methods-important/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
