Archives for the '.NET Tests' Category
Will liability change everything?
Some software application bug must have really pissed of Commissioners Viviane Reding and Meglena Kuneva as they want software developers to be held liable for the security and efficacy of their product.
Alen Cox, one of the leading Linux kernel developers argues against the liability. “Closed-source companies could not be held liable for their code […]
Isolate your ASP.NET – Race for Free Licenses
Our team is launching a new product for ASP.NET developers who develop with integrity – the ASP.NET Bundle.
For the launch you can win FREE licenses if you are fast enough.
See our official blog with the detail on getting free licenses.
Good luck…
Converting Dynamic Types to Generic Parameters
There is a problem when an API uses a Generic Parameter as a Type reference. Although having a generic parameter makes the code Type Safe
SafeType MyApi<SafeType>();
.csharpcode, .csharpcode pre
{
font-size: small;
color: black;
font-family: consolas, “Courier New”, courier, monospace;
background-color: #ffffff;
/*white-space: pre;*/
}
.csharpcode pre { margin: 0em; }
.csharpcode .rem { color: #008000; }
.csharpcode .kwrd { color: #0000ff; }
.csharpcode .str { […]
Typemock Isolator goes open source
Due to the overwhelming request by the community, we have received thousands of e-mails from .NET developers, that almost crashed our servers. And after we have had serious discussions with a large software company, we have managed to find a way that will allow us to open source Typemock Isolator for the benefit of the […]
Unit Tests and Developers under Pressure
In TechEd 2008 David Platt interviewed Roy about the future of TDD. You should really view the Tech-Talk as Dave is really funny, although he does miss the number of possible TLA’s (which he recursively defines as a TLA = Three Letter Acronym) by 300.
About 5 minutes into the session David asks a key question: […]
Isolator for SharePoint - Free License
Get a free Typemock Isolator license:
[Update: Contest is finished, Thanks to all you bloggers]
We’re announcing today about a new product: Isolator for SharePoint. It is almost the same as Typemock Isolator, but will only work on APIs that are directly connected with sharepoint’s API. That means that if you only need to test sharepoint […]
Unit Testing Collections
I have written about Lowering the friction of Unit testing, and how using Aspect Faking we can lower the friction of testing collections
The problem
Unit testing collections can be a bit tricky. Lets see some code and unit test this Sum() method:
public List<Salary> Salaries { get; }
public float Sum()
{
float total = 0;
[…]
Lowering the friction of Unit testing
At Typemock we have been learning allot about our customers lately and understanding where the friction is so that we can make unit testing even easier and maintainable.
What we are succeeding in doing is to lower the density of the tests (this means less code in each test) and raise the test resilient (this […]
Typemock embraces SharePoint
We have been getting a lot of traction from the SharePoint development community about the ease that Typemock Isolator helps unit test SharePoint Applications.
The Practices and Patterns Group in Microsoft have released a SharePoint Guidance that you can download the November 2008 version here. Typemock Isolator is being used as the primary isolating tool.
We […]
Ruby Style Isolating - Aspect Faking
I have talked in the past about Ruby Style Isolating (Dynamically Typed), now it is part of the AAA syntax.
The big value of this feature is that you don’t have to inherit a type in order to replace it with a fake, the downfall of this is that when you refactor your code, you […]
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0