<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Big Steps to Code Integrity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.elilopian.com/2009/05/26/big-steps-to-code-integrity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.elilopian.com/2009/05/26/big-steps-to-code-integrity/</link>
	<description>Creating better software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 09:09:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.elilopian.com/2009/05/26/big-steps-to-code-integrity/comment-page-1/#comment-38226</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 15:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elilopian.com/2009/05/26/big-steps-to-code-integrity/#comment-38226</guid>
		<description>A wise Quality Assurance Manager once told me that if you look carefully at what &quot;QA&quot; stands for:  it&#039;s to &quot;assure&quot; the quality of the product, not to build in quality.  It all comes back to the developer to build in quality, security, scalability, etc. etc.  QA&#039;s job is to verify that it is meeting the requirements.  At http://www.codeintegritysolutions.com, we see a number of organizations who are working hard to build quality into the software development process, not after the fact.  Better design tools, static analysis and building of test frameworks are a great way for developers to build in quality.  It&#039;s good engineering and better/cheaper/faster in the long run.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A wise Quality Assurance Manager once told me that if you look carefully at what &#8220;QA&#8221; stands for:  it&#8217;s to &#8220;assure&#8221; the quality of the product, not to build in quality.  It all comes back to the developer to build in quality, security, scalability, etc. etc.  QA&#8217;s job is to verify that it is meeting the requirements.  At <a href="http://www.codeintegritysolutions.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.codeintegritysolutions.com</a>, we see a number of organizations who are working hard to build quality into the software development process, not after the fact.  Better design tools, static analysis and building of test frameworks are a great way for developers to build in quality.  It&#8217;s good engineering and better/cheaper/faster in the long run.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

