Comments on: Does you code have integrity? http://www.elilopian.com/2009/05/06/does-you-code-have-integrity/ Creating better software Mon, 02 Jan 2012 09:09:26 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Development and Integrity Management by Eli Lopian » Big Steps to Code Integrity http://www.elilopian.com/2009/05/06/does-you-code-have-integrity/comment-page-1/#comment-39053 Development and Integrity Management by Eli Lopian » Big Steps to Code Integrity Sun, 07 Jun 2009 10:02:02 +0000 http://www.elilopian.com/2009/05/06/does-you-code-have-integrity/#comment-39053 [...] Typemock is making big steps towards its goal of code integrity. Code integrity is what we consider the new paradigm of writing software. Moving the responsibility of code-correctness back to the developers. It is too easy to get sloppy and to leave it to the QA to find our bugs, thus developing without integrity and leading to waste in time and money. When developing with integrity, we are all responsible to make sure the code does what was intended to do. [...] [...] Typemock is making big steps towards its goal of code integrity. Code integrity is what we consider the new paradigm of writing software. Moving the responsibility of code-correctness back to the developers. It is too easy to get sloppy and to leave it to the QA to find our bugs, thus developing without integrity and leading to waste in time and money. When developing with integrity, we are all responsible to make sure the code does what was intended to do. [...]

]]> By: Eli Lopian http://www.elilopian.com/2009/05/06/does-you-code-have-integrity/comment-page-1/#comment-36721 Eli Lopian Fri, 08 May 2009 11:38:59 +0000 http://www.elilopian.com/2009/05/06/does-you-code-have-integrity/#comment-36721 What you are suggesting are ways to reach a higher code integrity. But I am looking for a *measurement* of code integrity. Something that will help us see what actions have more impact on our code integrity What you are suggesting are ways to reach a higher code integrity. But I am looking for a *measurement* of code integrity. Something that will help us see what actions have more impact on our code integrity

]]> By: Andy http://www.elilopian.com/2009/05/06/does-you-code-have-integrity/comment-page-1/#comment-36690 Andy Fri, 08 May 2009 04:06:31 +0000 http://www.elilopian.com/2009/05/06/does-you-code-have-integrity/#comment-36690 Integrity has another meaning which is to be unimpaired or even perfect in condition. I think of it more as the software should do what it is intended to do (you're right - whether it benefits the customer or not). This means no bugs and no incomplete functionality (which could be characterized as a bug I guess). Regression tests, source code analysis, dynamic analysis, manual testing, code review, fuzzing, are just some of the many strategies for creating software with integrity. Integrity has another meaning which is to be unimpaired or even perfect in condition. I think of it more as the software should do what it is intended to do (you’re right – whether it benefits the customer or not). This means no bugs and no incomplete functionality (which could be characterized as a bug I guess). Regression tests, source code analysis, dynamic analysis, manual testing, code review, fuzzing, are just some of the many strategies for creating software with integrity.

]]> By: Raoul Duke http://www.elilopian.com/2009/05/06/does-you-code-have-integrity/comment-page-1/#comment-36667 Raoul Duke Thu, 07 May 2009 21:50:52 +0000 http://www.elilopian.com/2009/05/06/does-you-code-have-integrity/#comment-36667 seems like there are 2 approaches: 1) theory: proofs, modeling. 2) practice: testing, manual or automated. seems like there are 2 approaches:

1) theory: proofs, modeling.

2) practice: testing, manual or automated.

]]>