Funny discussion from Twitter
Here is an entertaining snippet from twitter:
Ben Hall asked
Wonder how TypeMock came up with the "Cut costs by as much as 40%" (twitter)
Daniel Fernandes answered:
TypeMock.Expect(x => x.GetMinimumCostSaving()).Return(.4) (twitter)
touché!
For those that want the real answer.
We do case studies from our customers and we measure the cost of development (including QA) before using Typemock and unit testing and after. We have witnessed many customers that once they start unit testing and getting up to speed with automating their code tests (I call this code integrity), the time to find and fix bugs is much shorter. Our customers have seen long QA process, that take both QA and developers time fall to 0 (yes zero.) thus saving 40% of their development costs!
Recent Posts
- Top 5 questions to ask when checking references
- Unacceptable: Unit testing will take 20 years to catch on
- The 4 reasons why we DIDN’T choose Oslo
- Typemock Academy Launch
- The First Rule to Software Craftsmanship
Categories
- .NET Tests
- Agile
- Code Integrity
- Community
- Debugging
- Fun
- Management for Geeks
- Marketing
- Product
- Release
- Reviews
- SharePoint
- TDD
- Time Management
- Uncategorized
- Unit Tests
Archives
- August 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- December 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
