Archives for March 2009

Building the Management Team

I have read an article about Building the Management Team on Entrepreneur. It gives a nice outlay of the management team, but I don’t think that it really helps with the real hard stuff. How do you know who to get and how do you make sure that you got the right person?
I have […]

31 March 2009 | Management for Geeks | No Comments

Throwing the Boss Out…

Jurgen Appelo has a post: Optimize Communication, Throw the Boss Out. It is great that Jurgen is writing about this topic, as I have been trying to tackle this for some time now. Here is what Jurgen asks
How do you align many teams to work towards a common goal?

My take is that you just have […]

31 March 2009 | Management for Geeks | 1 Comment

Beyond Scrum and Lean

Both Ron Jeffries has commented on my Event vs Polling ideas and so has Travis Illig about having fun with status meetings.
They both use the same argument: We use Scrum standup meetings, we ask what we did, what they are going to do and what is stopping them. This is enough information.
I am all […]

30 March 2009 | Management for Geeks | 5 Comments

Safe is Risky

These are the words of the original Purple Cow himself, it’s risky to be safe. I love it. It is really risky to play it safe!
So why don’t we take risks all the time?
Taking a risk means that we know that we have a chance of losing something. So we refrain from doing […]

30 March 2009 | Management for Geeks | 1 Comment

Status meetings can be fun

Status meeting can be really boring. Actually they are normally a waste of time. I have been to many long status meetings where the manager drags everyone through everyone else’s tasks, task by excruciating task. As some people say: Status is for Reporting not Meeting. 
On the other hand, as we are working as […]

29 March 2009 | Management for Geeks | 3 Comments

Why do we ignore your arguments?

With the release of Isolator Version 5.3, we have added the ability to simulate external components based on the arguments passed to those components. We called this Conditional Behavior.
Our default is to ignore arguments, to fake a method without taking the arguments into consideration, neither the number of arguments (overloads) or the values […]

26 March 2009 | Product, Release | No Comments

The journey from an Inventor to a CEO

When I started Typemock I was the Inventor, it was great fun, I did everything from developing to marketing to sales. I worked until 4:00 am learning and discovering and it was an amazing time.
Typemock started to grow and I had to bring in more people to help me, it started with support and then […]

25 March 2009 | Management for Geeks | 1 Comment

200% Responsibility

When something is really important to us we must have at least 200% Responsibility. 100% responsibility is just not enough.
With my children for example, 100% responsibility is not enough, when I cross the road with them, both myself and my wife are on the look out. This is because when […]

25 March 2009 | Management for Geeks | 5 Comments

The difference between GTD and Integrity

Getting Things Done (GTD) is an action management method created by David Allen. It is based on the principal that we have to get things out of mind by recording them, so that we can focus on the task at hand.
Following are the differences between GTD and Integrity based on GDT principals.
GDT Core Principals
Collect
In […]

24 March 2009 | Management for Geeks | No Comments

Event-Driven vs Polling

We had a short discussion in the office about my post about the difference between Scrum and Integrity. The discussion was:
“I don’t understand, there is no difference, we do exactly the same things in Scrum and in Integrity. The Customer will know after the sprint what we managed to do.”
This is exactly […]

24 March 2009 | Management for Geeks | 3 Comments

Search Development and Integrity Management by Eli Lopian

Navigation

Recent Posts

Categories

Archives

Managment