DotNetRocks Interview
I had a real fun talk with Richard and Carl on DotNetRocks. You can listen to the show here.
The highlight was a grand piano being delivered to Carl during the interview.
Although the show was mainly targeted at Dependency Injections, there are many other design issues that are not required because TypeMock is design agnostic. One is the unnecessary need for virtual method Take a look at Jeremy’s post for more details.
If you enjoyed this article please consider sharing it!
2 Comments to “DotNetRocks Interview”
Recent Posts
- Unacceptable: Unit testing will take 20 years to catch on
- The 4 reasons why we DIDN’T choose Oslo
- Typemock Academy Launch
- The First Rule to Software Craftsmanship
- Goal-driven Development
Categories
- .NET Tests
- Agile
- Code Integrity
- Community
- Debugging
- Fun
- Management for Geeks
- Marketing
- Product
- Release
- Reviews
- SharePoint
- TDD
- Time Management
- Uncategorized
- Unit Tests
Archives
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- December 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
Hi Eli.
Definitely one of the worst .NET Rocks shows I ever listened to.
Carl and Richard didn’t even got an hint of a clue of what TypeMock is and what can be done with it.
They definitely owe you a DNR TV show.
Thanks for the heads up Paulo.
I also felt that I didn’t manage to convey the Magic of TypeMock in this show.