http://www.elilopian.com/2007/04/16/a-different-approach-to-mock-verification/ Creating better software Mon, 02 Jan 2012 09:09:26 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 http://www.elilopian.com/2007/04/16/a-different-approach-to-mock-verification/comment-page-1/#comment-516 Eli Lopian Tue, 17 Apr 2007 07:24:18 +0000 http://www.elilopian.com/2007/04/16/a-different-approach-to-mock-verification/#comment-516 True, Although that is not the only challenge. Having void methods and validating arguments are another. True,
Although that is not the only challenge.
Having void methods and validating arguments are another.

]]> http://www.elilopian.com/2007/04/16/a-different-approach-to-mock-verification/comment-page-1/#comment-510 Scott Bellware Mon, 16 Apr 2007 23:25:42 +0000 http://www.elilopian.com/2007/04/16/a-different-approach-to-mock-verification/#comment-510 I think the challenge here is that the method name is represented as a string. If there's no alternative to this then it would be an annoying hindrance to refactoring. I think the challenge here is that the method name is represented as a string. If there’s no alternative to this then it would be an annoying hindrance to refactoring.

]]>