<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Low Coupling is NOT a Silver Bullet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.elilopian.com/2006/10/04/more-posts-on-the-typemocktestability-issue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.elilopian.com/2006/10/04/more-posts-on-the-typemocktestability-issue/</link>
	<description>Creating better software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 09:09:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eli Lopian&#8217;s Blog (TypeMock) &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Design and Testability - YAGNI</title>
		<link>http://www.elilopian.com/2006/10/04/more-posts-on-the-typemocktestability-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>Eli Lopian&#8217;s Blog (TypeMock) &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Design and Testability - YAGNI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elilopian.com/2006/10/04/more-posts-on-the-typemocktestability-issue/#comment-130</guid>
		<description>[...] So, Does testing -&#160;driving your design, actually create the best design? I am not sure.It does one thing for sure, It creates a low coupled (modular) design. But low coupling is NOT a silver bullet. A good design has to take and BALANCE many factors, this is a complex task. Adding Testability to these factors might unbalance your design. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So, Does testing -&nbsp;driving your design, actually create the best design? I am not sure.It does one thing for sure, It creates a low coupled (modular) design. But low coupling is NOT a silver bullet. A good design has to take and BALANCE many factors, this is a complex task. Adding Testability to these factors might unbalance your design. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paraesthesia</title>
		<link>http://www.elilopian.com/2006/10/04/more-posts-on-the-typemocktestability-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>paraesthesia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 17:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elilopian.com/2006/10/04/more-posts-on-the-typemocktestability-issue/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>[...]  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.paraesthesia.com/blog/weblog.php?id=P1090&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Mocking Debate Heats Up&lt;/a&gt; - I posted last week a short discussion about whether mock objects are too powerful for most developers.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  <a href="http://www.paraesthesia.com/blog/weblog.php?id=P1090" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Mocking Debate Heats Up</a> &#8211; I posted last week a short discussion about whether mock objects are too powerful for most developers.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

